Bug 2455323

Summary: Review Request: rust-pulp - Safe generic simd
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: decathorpe, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---Flags: decathorpe: fedora-review+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://crates.io/crates/pulp
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-05-08 17:44:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2445096    

Description wojnilowicz 2026-04-06 07:16:32 UTC
Spec URL: https://wojnilowicz.fedorapeople.org/rust-pulp.spec
SRPM URL: https://wojnilowicz.fedorapeople.org/rust-pulp-0.22.2-1.fc43.src.rpm
rust2rpm.toml URL: https://wojnilowicz.fedorapeople.org/rust2rpm.toml

Description:
Safe generic simd.

Fedora Account System Username: wojnilowicz

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-06 14:57:57 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10295078
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2455323-rust-pulp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10295078-rust-pulp/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2026-04-29 12:04:25 UTC
The built packages don't all install:

Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides (crate(pulp-macro/default) >= 0.1.1 with crate(pulp-macro/default) < 0.2.0~) needed by rust-pulp+macro-devel-0.22.2-1.fc45.noarch from @commandline

Looks like you need to either package the "pulp-macro" crate or hide the "macro" feature.

Comment 3 wojnilowicz 2026-04-29 15:14:15 UTC
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2)
> The built packages don't all install:
> 
> Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides (crate(pulp-macro/default) >= 0.1.1 with
> crate(pulp-macro/default) < 0.2.0~) needed by
> rust-pulp+macro-devel-0.22.2-1.fc45.noarch from @commandline
> 
> Looks like you need to either package the "pulp-macro" crate or hide the
> "macro" feature.

Thanks for pointing this out. It was difficult to spot when everything was green, and wiremix haven't requested it.

As for the solution, I went with hiding the "macro" feature. Please re-review.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-04-29 15:20:37 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10406644
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2455323-rust-pulp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10406644-rust-pulp/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Fabio Valentini 2026-05-03 15:48:15 UTC
Looks like the links are now returning HTTP 404 errors, please check.

Comment 6 wojnilowicz 2026-05-04 16:52:11 UTC
They work for me and they worked for Copr as seen from the successful build above. 

Which links are you referring to?

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2026-05-05 13:54:16 UTC
It looks like this was an infrastructure issue that caused any fedorapeople links to be broken, but it was fixed.

Doing final review now ...

Comment 8 Fabio Valentini 2026-05-05 14:16:20 UTC
Looks good to me now.

===

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.
Patches are justified, documented, and are OK to keep downstream-only.

✅ package contains only permissible content
✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass
✅ latest version of the crate is packaged
✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora
✅ license file is included with %license in %files
✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-05-06 16:33:11 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-pulp
Monitoring:
Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`

Comment 10 wojnilowicz 2026-05-06 17:34:55 UTC
Thank you for the review.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-05-08 17:41:52 UTC
FEDORA-2026-0641fa2899 (rust-pulp-0.22.2-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-0641fa2899

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2026-05-08 17:44:13 UTC
FEDORA-2026-0641fa2899 (rust-pulp-0.22.2-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.