Bug 246004
| Summary: | fftw: epel branch/builds, rpmforge compatible | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Quentin Spencer <qspencer> |
| Component: | fftw | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | el5 | CC: | orion, rdieter |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-07-12 16:59:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Quentin Spencer
2007-06-27 20:24:02 UTC
I see that this package already has a EL-4 branch and rdieter.edu is listed as maintainer for EPEL. I went ahead and made the branch. Let me know if any other changes are needed. That's correct; I should have thought to contact the existing maintainer. Anyway, I need an fftw version >=3 to support octave in EPEL. The version in the EL-5 branch is fftw 2. rdeiter, do you object to my putting version 3 in the EL-5 branch? Sure, I'd like to coordinate compatibility with rpmforge. They have *strong* feelings that fftw version 3 should be named fftw3. I don't care strongly one way or the other, so I was planning on doing it that way, just haven't gotten round-tuit yet. I'll be away at akademy for the next week, and will likely have little time. I'm ok with someone else building this for epel, provided they: * make it named fftw3 * convince me soundly that naming it fftw3 is a bad idea, and build it named fftw (like devel/ branch). Gahh, I hate this kind of stuff: - Isn't this backwards to what one usually does - name the latest version without the major version and the older ones with it? What happens when fttw 4 comes out? The names get even sillier. - Although, in this case, the libraries in fftw 3.x are actually called libfftw3.. so in some sense it is upstream being silly too (though the tarball is just fftw-3.X) - Finally, I really just want fftw 3.X, and can't really get worked up about what it's called. I'll make the necessary change in the BR and leave it (hopefully) forever. Will get confused sometimes though comparing my EL systems to my Fedora systems... FYI, builds queue'd. Please test for sanity: EL-4: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=34938 EL-5: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=34937 fwiw, even fedora's builds include Provides: fftw3 and Provides: fftw3-devel So using, BuildRequires: fftw3-devel should work everywhere. At knurd's suggestion, added Provides, appears safe in my own testing... * Thu Jul 12 2007 Rex Dieter <rdieter[AT]fedoraproject.org> 3.1.2-5 - fftw3(-devel): Provides: fftw(-devel) = %version ... - cleanup, +%check section (disabled by default) * Tue Jul 10 2007 Rex Dieter <rdieter[AT]fedoraproject.org> 3.1.2-4 - (re)name -> fftw3 (epel-only, for rpmforge compatibility, #246004) builds queue'd, closing->errata. Enjoy. |