Bug 246349

Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Steven Pritchard <steve>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, me, notting, opensource
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: NotReady
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-30 01:58:50 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Steven Pritchard 2007-06-30 15:36:10 EDT
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Pugs/perl-Perl6-Pugs.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Perl6-Pugs-6.2.13-1.src.rpm
Pugs is an implementation of Perl 6, written in Haskell. It aims to support
the full Perl 6 specification, as detailed in the Synopses.

Please note - This package is not quite ready for review, but I'm working on it.
Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-12-29 01:49:23 EST
Is this ready for review now?
is there any updates before I will review this?
Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2007-12-29 23:53:00 EST
Development of pugs has stalled.  It may not make sense to include it in Fedora
at the moment.

I'll be looking at it again soon(-ish) to decide if it makes more sense to keep
working on pugs.  I'll let you know what I come up with.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-25 18:13:10 EDT
I'm going to go ahead and mark this as not ready; if you'd like a review, just
clear the whiteboard.  If not, I guess you can close this ticket.
Comment 4 Till Maas 2008-12-10 08:10:49 EST
see comment:3
Comment 5 Steven Pritchard 2008-12-10 10:39:24 EST
There's been new pugs development recently.  I'll try to update my package ASAP.
Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-25 19:04:39 EST
This has been marked not ready for a really long time now.  Is a new package forthcoming or should this just be closed out?
Comment 7 Caius Chance 2010-04-30 00:33:32 EDT
Ping. If there is no update I would suggest to have this closed.
Comment 8 Caius Chance 2010-04-30 01:58:50 EDT