Bug 246390

Summary: Review Request: opensm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Doug Ledford <dledford>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, opensource
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-21 16:06:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 246389    
Bug Blocks: 246391    

Description Doug Ledford 2007-07-01 17:15:27 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246389 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246388 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246387 +++

opensm is part of the infiniband stack for managing Infiniband hardware and
networks.  The opensm package implements the subnet manager necessary to make an
infiniband network operational (infiniband cards use static subnet routing, this
package scans the fabric and updates all the attached nodes with the routes
needed to access other nodes).
Comment 1 Till Maas 2007-09-08 13:36:11 UTC 
There is no spec/srpm for this at
http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/
Comment 2 Doug Ledford 2008-01-21 16:06:42 UTC 
Upstream used to put out a 50MB rpm that spit out something like 30 different
sub-rpms.  After massive brow beating on my part, they split everything up into
individual rpms.  I've had the process of getting them into fedora on the back
burner as I sort through the individual rpms and whip them into shape.  So,
originally this package depended on that huge package, and now it depends on
some of the split off packages.  Since this needs to change to accommodate, and
since the others aren't all done and in yet, this is languishing.  It might be
easiest to just close out all the review requests that were cloned from 246390
and let me reopen new review requests when the dust has settled.