Bug 246598

Summary: yum replaces digikamimageplugins.x86_64 0.9.1-1.fc7 with digikam.i386
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Roderick Johnstone <rmj>
Component: yumAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7CC: james.antill
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-07-06 20:23:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
output of yum -d 6 update none

Description Roderick Johnstone 2007-07-03 11:31:58 UTC 
Description of problem:
yum update tries to install digikam.i386 when replacing
digikamimageplugins.x86_64 0.9.1-1.fc7.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

yum-3.2.1-1.fc7
with patch from BZ#246078, and additional patch from comment #9 of #246078  (but
it was the same before I applied any patch).

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum update
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Installing:
 digikam                 x86_64     0.9.2-1.fc7      updates            10 M
     replacing  digikamimageplugins.x86_64 0.9.1-1.fc7

 digikam                 i386       0.9.2-1.fc7      updates            10 M
     replacing  digikamimageplugins.x86_64 0.9.1-1.fc7


Expected results:
Installing:
 digikam                 x86_64     0.9.2-1.fc7      updates            10 M
     replacing  digikamimageplugins.x86_64 0.9.1-1.fc7


Additional info:
Installing digikam.i386 then sucks in other unwanted i386 packages.
Comment 1 Roderick Johnstone 2007-07-03 11:31:58 UTC 
Created attachment 158425 [details]
output of yum -d 6 update
Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2007-07-06 20:23:16 UTC 
This is the right thing given that obsoletes aren't arch-specific