Bug 2481897 (CVE-2026-45446)

Summary: CVE-2026-45446 openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: rhel-process-autobot, security-response-team, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. The implementations of AES-SIV (Advanced Encryption Standard - SIV) and AES-GCM-SIV (Advanced Encryption Standard - Galois/Counter Mode - SIV) incorrectly process authentication tags for empty messages. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to forge empty messages with arbitrary Additional Authenticated Data (AAD) in applications that utilize these specific cipher modes within custom protocols and do not properly handle zero-length ciphertexts. This could lead to unauthorized data manipulation.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Deadline: 2026-06-09   

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-05-27 14:22:29 UTC
Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes

Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (CVE-2026-45446)
Severity: Low

Issue summary: The implementations of AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV
(RFC 8452) mishandle the authentication of AAD (Additional Authenticated
Data) with an empty ciphertext allowing a forgery of such messages.

Impact summary: An attacker can forge empty messages with arbitrary AAD
to the victim's application using these ciphers.

AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) are nonce-misuse-resistant AEAD
modes: they accept a key, nonce, optional AAD (bytes that are authenticated
but not encrypted), and plaintext, and produces ciphertext plus a 16-byte
tag. On decrypt, EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() is documented to return success only
if the tag is verified succesfully.

In OpenSSL's provider implementation of these ciphers, the expected tag is
computed only when decryption function is invoked with non-empty data.
If the caller supplies AAD and then calls EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() without
invocation of the ciphertext update, which can happen when the received
ciphertext length is zero, the tag is never recalculated and still holds its
all-zeros value.

When AES-GCM-SIV is used, an attacker who sends arbitrary AAD, empty
ciphertext, and all-zeros tag passes authentication under any key they do not
know, single-shot. When AES-SIV is used, for mounting the attack it's
necessary for the application to reuse the decryption context without
resetting the key.

AES-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.0. AES-GCM-SIV is implemented since
OpenSSL 3.2.

No protocols implemented in OpenSSL itself (TLS/CMS/PKCS7/HPKE/QUIC) support
either AES-GCM-SIV or AES-SIV. To mount an attack, the applications must
implement their own protocol and use the EVP interface. Also they must skip the
ciphertext update when a message with an empty ciphertext arrives.

The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this
issue, as these algorithms are not FIPS approved and the affected code is
outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 (AES-SIV mode only) are vulnerable to this
issue.

OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.1.
OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2.
OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6.
OpenSSL 3.4 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.4.5.
OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.20.

This issue was reported by Alex Gaynor (Anthropic) on 16th April 2026.
The fix was developed by Dmitry Belyavskiy (Red Hat) based on reporter's
recommendations.

Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2026-06-11 12:32:06 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:25237 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25237

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2026-06-11 12:34:54 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:25239 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25239