Bug 248354

Summary: separate mpfr package
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Component: gmpAssignee: Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: dcantrell, jakub
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-07-20 08:05:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
suggested spec file
none
Proposed spec
none
srpm of the proposed package none

Description Ivana Varekova 2007-07-16 12:10:35 UTC
Description of problem:
separate mpfr package
(see #211762 comments).
The suggested spec file is attached.

Comment 1 Ivana Varekova 2007-07-16 12:10:35 UTC
Created attachment 159315 [details]
suggested spec file

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2007-07-16 12:24:36 UTC
Are the two %configure invocations really intentional?
Shouldn't mpfr-devel Obsolete older versions of gmp-devel (which also contain
mpfr.h and libmpfr.a)?


Comment 3 Ivana Varekova 2007-07-16 12:37:53 UTC
Created attachment 159317 [details]
Proposed spec

Thanks for your comment.
You are right the first %command part is useless.
I'm not sure when this package will be add to cvs so there is no gmp package
without mpfs part so there is not the version number which should be put to
obsolete flag - but thank you very much - when it is in cvs I will add obsolete
flag.

Comment 4 Ivana Varekova 2007-07-16 13:42:03 UTC
Created attachment 159319 [details]
srpm of the proposed package

Comment 5 Ivana Varekova 2007-07-20 08:05:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 248363 ***