Bug 248692

*** Bug 248693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

You have put up many packages for review lately; perhaps you should consider
doing some package reviews yourself.  I believe there are some R packages up for
review which were submitted by someone else.

Sorry I was on vacation, I do not mind to do R reviews as I start to know how to
do the packages ;-).
I have found on the list 2 R package that you have approved by that time, but I
will try to keep me in touch with the new R package to review them.

For the numbers of package that I submitted to review, most of them are only
dependances for other package the R CMD check ask not only for the package
required but also for the package suggested (which sometime are only data files
http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.0/bioc/html/annotate.html => hgu95av2 is only
data file)
I do have problems packaging it, each package ask for many dependances and as it
is the beginning I have a lot to do to finally being able to package the
software of interest...

Thanks anyway for your help

There is the newest version with the correct license tag :

SPEC
http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer.spec
SRPM
http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer-0.1-2.fc6.src.rpm

++

This package is fine; the only thing I can see is that you don't need the manual
R dependency for arch-specific R packages because rpm will find the libR.so
dependency on its own.

* source files match upstream:
   94aaeb5fb7b164223fc71f3d9813ce5a75c88cf7ff18521ab6012a5039511f9f  
   rlecuyer_0.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* package follows R packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has only the expected complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane (extraneous R dependency):
   rlecuyer.so()(64bit)
   R-rlecuyer = 0.1-2.fc9
  =
   /bin/sh
?  R
   libR.so()(64bit)

* %check is present and all tests pass.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: R-rlecuyer
Short Description: R interface to RNG with multiple streams
Owners: pingou
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

cvs done.

R-rlecuyer-0.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-rlecuyer'

R-rlecuyer-0.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-rlecuyer'

R-rlecuyer-0.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

R-rlecuyer-0.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.