Bug 249048
Summary: | compact flash card not detected and mounted | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Hrasky <phrasky> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 7 | CC: | chris.brown | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | 2.6.22 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2007-09-20 12:29:22 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Petr Hrasky
2007-07-20 15:26:44 UTC
I would like to see dmesg taken after the insertion. this is shortly after boot: audit(1185041526.584:2): audit_pid=2017 old=0 by auid=4294967295 Bluetooth: Core ver 2.11 NET: Registered protocol family 31 Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized Bluetooth: L2CAP ver 2.8 Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.8 Bluetooth: HIDP (Human Interface Emulation) ver 1.2 i2c_adapter i2c-2: SMBus Quick command not supported, can't probe for chips w83627ehf: unsupported chip ID: 0xffff eth0: no IPv6 routers present NET: Registered protocol family 4 NET: Registered protocol family 5 so nothing to work on I guess. Anyway since then I upgraded to kernel-2.6.22.1-27.fc7 and it work well again. And this is what I get in 2.6.22.1, dmesg, messages NET: Registered protocol family 5 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 31488 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB) sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 02 00 00 00 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 31488 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB) sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 02 00 00 00 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through sdc: sdc1 Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 31488 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB) Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 31488 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB) Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through Jul 21 20:27:02 hal9000 kernel: sdc: sdc1 Jul 21 20:27:15 hal9000 automount[2373]: lookup_mount: >> /usr/sbin/showmount: can't get address for .directory Jul 21 20:27:16 hal9000 hald: mounted /dev/sdc1 on behalf of uid 500 Please attach the COMPLETE dmesg. I'd like to see if we enabled ub by accident. Please do not drop it into comments box. Created attachment 159736 [details]
dmesg output
output from dmesg after boot and inserting of a cf card
Hello, I'm reviewing this bug as part of the kernel bug triage project, an attempt to isolate current bugs in the fedora kernel. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage I am CC'ing myself to this bug and will try and assist you in resolving it if I can. There hasn't been much activity on this bug for a while. Could you tell me if you are still having problems with the latest kernel? If the problem no longer exists then please close this bug or I'll do so in a few days if there is no additional information lodged. Cheers Chris Latest 2.6.22.x kernels are working fine. I thought no new information is needed after I attached full dmesg output. Feel free to close the bug. However I have no idea what went wrong with the particular kernel release. I can't shed any light on it - I also had the same problem with previous kernels. Please re-open if you experience a regression of course. Thanks for the update. Cheers Chris |