Bug 249468

Summary: Dependency for bcfg2 doesn't exist in EPEL
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Meethune Bhowmick <bhowmick>
Component: bcfg2Assignee: Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: el4CC: icon, kevin, mschick
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-12-09 05:32:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 245690    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Source rpm for python-lxml none

Description Meethune Bhowmick 2007-07-24 20:43:50 UTC 
Description of problem:
bcfg2 requires python-lxml which doesn't exit in the EPEL repository

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.9.4-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install clean rhel4 system
2. Add epel repo to sources
3. up2date bcfg2
  
Actual results:
Error: Missing Dependency: python-lxml is needed by package bcfg2

Expected results:
Should pull python-lxml as dependency

Additional info:
This issue also affects el5 as well.
Comment 1 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2007-07-24 21:03:21 UTC 
I've been trying to contact the python-lxml maintainer for almost a month now
(see #245690).  Unless he responds soon we'll probably need to declare him AWOL
and find new maintainers for his packages.
Comment 2 Meethune Bhowmick 2007-07-25 13:34:00 UTC 
Created attachment 159922 [details]
Source rpm for python-lxml

This is the source rpm that I am using to resolve the dependency. I've run it
through brew. It builds on all arches and I have tested on i386 and x86_64. If
the maintainer is in fact AWOL, I wouldn't mind picking up maintainer-ship (If
that is appropriate).
Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2007-09-12 22:49:48 UTC 
Looks like python-lxml is in epel now, can this bug be closed?