Bug 250258

Summary:	Package change request - no review bug found
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Orion Poplawski <orion>
Component:	qhull	Assignee:	Ralf Corsepius <rc040203>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	lxtnow
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-10-17 19:58:32 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Orion Poplawski 2007-07-31 13:59:09 UTC

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: qhull
New Branches: EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: orion.com
Updated EPEL CC: 

Ralf has no interest in EPEL (as stated here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus?highlight=%28epel%29), but
is willing to allow others to maintain EPEL branches of his packages.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2007-07-31 15:11:09 UTC

Could you provide some reference to back up your statement that Ralf is OK with
this, or could Ralf give us an ack?  I don't want to go branching packages
against anyone's will.

Comment 2 Ralf Corsepius 2007-07-31 16:18:18 UTC

this is the mail I sent to Orion in response to his inquiry:

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 16:37 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'd like to see qhull built for EPEL (EL-5 at least).  If you aren't 
> interested in supporting EPEL, I'd be happy to maintain the EL branches.
No, I consider EPEL to be harmful to Fedora and am not interested in
support it.

That said, feel free to maintain this package for EPEL, I won't look 
into it.

Ralf

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2007-07-31 18:50:47 UTC

ok. cvs done.