|Summary:||[RFE] Package Felix programming language (ocaml)|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||John Skaller <skaller>|
|Component:||ocaml||Assignee:||Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||awilliam, skaller, triage|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2014-12-01 12:33:44 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description John Skaller 2007-08-05 11:51:17 UTC
Request to Package Felix Programming Language
Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2007-08-06 11:04:15 UTC
Changed the subject line to include some description and the magic word 'ocaml' so it appears in my OCaml to-do list search.
Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2007-11-08 15:43:16 UTC
Created attachment 251631 [details] output of ./configure I get errors during the configure stage, although they don't appear to be fatal.
Comment 3 Richard W.M. Jones 2007-11-08 15:43:55 UTC
Created attachment 251641 [details] output of make And more seriously I get a failure of 'make'. The full log from the make command is attached.
Comment 4 Richard W.M. Jones 2007-11-08 15:45:10 UTC
Other details: * Felix 1.1.4_x1 * OCaml 3.10.0 * Python 2.5.1 * GCC 4.1.2 Fedora 8
Comment 5 Richard W.M. Jones 2007-11-09 11:54:41 UTC
Created attachment 252651 [details] Output of ./configure
Comment 6 Richard W.M. Jones 2007-11-09 11:55:12 UTC
Created attachment 252661 [details] Output of make Output of make from a freshly unpacked tarball.
Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 13:33:10 UTC
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported during the development of Fedora 8. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are changing the version of this bug to '8'. If this bug still exists in rawhide, please change the version back to rawhide. (If you're unable to change the bug's version, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help and we apologize for the interruption. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Comment 8 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-04-04 13:51:14 UTC
Keeping this bug open, although I'm likely to close it unless upstream become responsive.
Comment 9 John Skaller 2008-04-04 14:08:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #8) > Keeping this bug open, although I'm likely to close it unless > upstream become responsive. Pls try building with SVN version. If that succeeds we'll release an image as a tarball, otherwise we'll fix it. Bugs in tarballs cannot be fixed (we ONLY work on the svn head due to lack of resources). The build system has been changed radically since the RTP was issued.
Comment 10 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-04-04 14:28:21 UTC
SVN version doesn't really get anywhere in the make. Output of configure and make will be attached shortly ...
Comment 11 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-04-04 14:30:23 UTC
Created attachment 300440 [details] Output of ./configure
Comment 12 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-04-04 14:30:57 UTC
Created attachment 300441 [details] Output of make
Comment 13 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-05-03 08:02:51 UTC
'firstname.lastname@example.org' can you not change the status of this bug without providing the requested info.
Comment 14 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 03:06:46 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 15 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-05-14 20:51:20 UTC
Hmmmm why am I not getting CC'd on these? Anyway, pushed back to Rawhide.
Comment 16 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 01:58:19 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 17 Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 12:21:17 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 18 Adam Williamson 2010-03-04 21:56:56 UTC
bugs with [RFE] in their description are exempted from the periodic re-assignment from 'Rawhide' to the latest release, so if you don't this kind of a 'request' bug to get changed from rawhide, put [RFE] in there :)
Comment 19 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-11-16 18:27:51 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 20 John Skaller 2014-12-01 12:33:17 UTC
stop sending archaic requests