Bug 2513372 (CVE-2026-68257)

Summary: CVE-2026-68257 kernel: drm/amdkfd: fix 32-bit overflow in CWSR total size calculation
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security <prodsec-ir-bot>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: akhatavk, aos-team-art-private, asdas, dpaolell, jdelft, jupierce, lgarciaa, mbiarnes, ppalepu, ppostler, prdhamdh, rhel-process-autobot, sghai, sidsharm, suppawar, vlaad, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's `drm/amdkfd` component. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the calculation of a memory allocation size. When processing large input values, this calculation can result in an undersized memory region, which can then be overrun by firmware. This could lead to system instability or a denial of service.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-10 12:33:44 UTC 
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdkfd: fix 32-bit overflow in CWSR total size calculation

total_cwsr_size was computed in 32-bit before being used as a BO/SVM
allocation size.
With large ctx_save_restore_area_size and debug_memory_size
multiplied by the XCC count, the product can wrap,
yielding an undersized CWSR save area that firmware later overruns.

Promote total_cwsr_size to u64 and use check_add_overflow()/
check_mul_overflow() in both kfd_queue_acquire_buffers() and
kfd_queue_release_buffers().

(cherry picked from commit 319f7e13423ae3f486b9aea82f9ad2d6af0ee608)
Comment 4 Jon Orris 2026-09-24 15:05:17 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:71602 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71602
Comment 5 Jon Orris 2026-09-25 06:12:59 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:71700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71700
Comment 9 Jon Orris 2026-10-27 22:02:58 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22

Via RHSA-2026:89197 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:89197