Bug 251719

Summary: zfcpconf.sh should support 3 fields in zfcp.conf
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Brad Hinson <bhinson>
Component: s390utilsAssignee: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.1CC: rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-15 22:11:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
zfcpconf.sh support for 3 or 5 values in /etc/zfcp.conf. Warn if using 5. none

Description Brad Hinson 2007-08-10 17:03:29 UTC 
Description of problem:
When installing to zFCP devices, anaconda now writes 3 fields to /etc/zfcp.conf 
- device number
- WWPN
- FCP LUN
This is because the fields for SCSI ID and SCSI LUN are obsolete and no longer
required.  zfcpconf.sh needs to be updated to read in 3 fields instead of
expecting 5.  Otherwise, the FCP LUN is substituted for the WWPN when bringing
the device online.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
s390utils-1.5.3-10.el5.11

How reproducible:
Install using zFCP so that anaconda creates /etc/zfcp.conf.
Comment 2 Brad Hinson 2007-08-10 18:42:40 UTC 
Created attachment 161070 [details]
zfcpconf.sh support for 3 or 5 values in /etc/zfcp.conf.  Warn if using 5.
Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2007-12-03 20:45:18 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  This request will
be reviewed for a future Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.
Comment 4 Phil Knirsch 2008-01-21 13:35:03 UTC 
Great fix, flagging for RHEL-5.3 and giving Devel ACK.

Read ya, Phil
Comment 5 Brad Hinson 2008-02-15 22:11:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 236016 ***