Bug 251845

Summary: kernel-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 spams dmesg with wireless debug messages
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Osma Ahvenlampi <oa+redhat>
Component: kernelAssignee: John W. Linville <linville>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7CC: cebbert, davej
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-08-13 17:11:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Osma Ahvenlampi 2007-08-12 11:14:26 UTC
Between kernel-2.6.22.1-33.fc7 and kernel-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 the wireless patches
have become really verbose. I'm using the iwl4965 driver with firmware 4.44.17
installed from intellinuxwireless.org.

[oa@libretto ~]$ dmesg | tail -5
wlan0: RX WEP frame with unknown keyidx 2 (A1=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
A2=00:11:95:4c:4a:25 A3=00:11:95:4c:4a:25)
wlan0: RX WEP frame with unknown keyidx 2 (A1=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
A2=00:11:95:4c:4a:25 A3=00:11:95:4c:4a:25)
wlan0: RX WEP frame with unknown keyidx 2 (A1=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
A2=00:11:95:4c:4a:25 A3=00:11:95:4c:4a:25)
wlan0: RX WEP frame with unknown keyidx 2 (A1=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
A2=00:11:95:4c:4a:25 A3=00:11:95:4c:4a:25)
wlan0: RX WEP frame with unknown keyidx 2 (A1=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
A2=00:11:95:4c:4a:25 A3=00:11:95:4c:4a:25)
[oa@libretto ~]$ dmesg | grep "RX WEP frame with unknown keyidx" | wc -l
688
[oa@libretto ~]$ dmesg | wc -l
1395

Comment 1 John W. Linville 2007-08-13 14:36:08 UTC
I don't really see any recent changes that would account for this -- the 
message itself has been around for quite a while.

Are you sure there hasn't been some configuration change in your network?

Comment 2 Osma Ahvenlampi 2007-08-13 17:11:48 UTC
You're correct - it's not new to -41. I just booted again with -33 and see the
same messages, so it must be a new device in the network or something.
Accordingly, I'll close this ticket, sorry about the false alert.

Still, the message is quite chatty, and is caused by events outside of the scope
of the local machine and the user's sphere of influence, so perhaps that should
be looked at upstream.