Bug 2524435 (CVE-2026-80585)

Summary:	CVE-2026-80585 kernel: mptcp: fastopen: only mark MPTFO subflows with SYN data
Product:	[Other] Security Response	Reporter:	OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component:	vulnerability	Assignee:	Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified	CC:	rhel-process-autobot, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:	A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. In the Multipath TCP (MPTCP) Fast Open feature, a vulnerability exists where the system incorrectly marks a subflow as MPTFO even when a TCP Fast Open (TFO) SYN packet does not contain data. This can lead to a stale MPTFO state, potentially triggering a state-confusion bug in the `check_fully_established()` function. This could result in system instability or a denial of service.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-26 14:51:30 UTC

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mptcp: fastopen: only mark MPTFO subflows with SYN data

Passive TCP Fast Open accepts a valid-cookie SYN even when it carries
no data. In that case the child socket's receive queue is intentionally
left empty.

mptcp_fastopen_subflow_synack_set_params() set is_mptfo before checking
for queued SYN data. That made data-less TFO SYNs hit a WARN and, if
the warning was non-fatal, left stale MPTFO state behind. The stale
flag could later trigger a state-confusion bug in
check_fully_established().

Only mark the subflow as MPTFO after confirming that an SKB was queued.
Return quietly when the receive queue is empty.

Note that mptcp_subflow_context's is_mptfo field is now not just about
subflows where the TFO was present, but about MPTFO subflow that
consumed SYN data. Only having a valid cookie but not carrying data is
not really "doing TFO".

Comment 1 gkamathe 2026-08-27 06:49:52 UTC

Upstream advisory:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2026082616-CVE-2026-80585-8682@gregkh/T