Bug 2527877 (CVE-2026-80739)

Summary: CVE-2026-80739 kernel: net/mlx5e: TC, Check if flow is PEER before acquiring devcom lock
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: akhatavk, aos-team-art-private, asdas, dpaolell, jdelft, jupierce, lgarciaa, mbiarnes, ppalepu, ppostler, prdhamdh, rhel-process-autobot, sghai, sidsharm, suppawar, vlaad, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. A race condition exists in the net/mlx5e driver's Traffic Control (TC) flow deletion mechanism. When a flow fails to be added, the deletion process attempts to acquire a lock without proper checks, leading to a recursive lock acquisition in certain 'peer flow' scenarios. This can result in a system deadlock, causing a denial of service.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-09-03 08:43:51 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5e: TC, Check if flow is PEER before acquiring devcom lock

In case __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow() fails in lower levels, the flow is
deleted via mlx5e_tc_del_flow(), and mlx5e_tc_del_flow() is acquiring
ESW devcom lock without condition. In addition, in case of peer_flow,
__mlx5e_add_fdb_flow() is called while holding ESW devcom comp lock.
This results in an AA deadlock.

To fix this, introduce a new PEER flag that is set on flows created as
peer flows (the duplicate flows on peer devices), and check it in
mlx5e_tc_del_flow() before acquiring ESW devcom lock.

Lockdep splat:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
============================================
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&comp->lock_key#2);
  lock(&comp->lock_key#2);
 *** DEADLOCK ***
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xbd/0xca
 __lock_acquire+0x1671/0x2ec0
 lock_acquire+0x10e/0x2e0
 down_read+0x95/0x430
 mlx5_devcom_for_each_peer_begin+0x4e/0xe0 [mlx5_core]
 mlx5e_tc_del_flow+0x11d/0xa70 [mlx5_core]
 mlx5e_flow_put+0x99/0x100 [mlx5_core]
 __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x409/0xf00 [mlx5_core]
 mlx5e_configure_flower+0x2a86/0x4100 [mlx5_core]
 mlx5e_rep_setup_tc_cls_flower+0x12f/0x1b0 [mlx5_core]
 mlx5e_rep_setup_tc_cb+0x153/0x750 [mlx5_core]
 tc_setup_cb_add+0x1dc/0x470
 fl_change+0x2f4d/0x626d [cls_flower]
 tc_new_tfilter+0x79b/0x2310
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x778/0xad0
 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x960
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
 </TASK>