Bug 2527992

Summary: CVE-2026-71220 gfs2-utils: gfs2-utils: stack out-of-bounds write via unchecked di_height in gfs2_edit [fedora-all]
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Samuele Negrini <snegrini>
Component: gfs2-utilsAssignee: Andrew Price <anprice>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: agk, agruenba, anprice, bmarzins, cfeist
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["700f8c4c-dab0-44fb-8f9d-ebccb1da0e00"]}
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2511398    

Description Samuele Negrini 2026-09-03 11:45:32 UTC
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.

A flaw was found in gfs2-utils. In the gfs2_edit tool, the metapath_to_lblock() function in extended.c uses the di_height field from on-disk inode metadata as an array index into a fixed-size stack array factor[GFS2_MAX_META_HEIGHT] (10 elements) without bounds validation. An attacker can craft a GFS2 filesystem image with di_height exceeding 10 (up to 65535) to write past the end of the array, corrupting adjacent stack memory including saved registers and the return address. The subsequent loop (factor[h] = factor[h+1] * sbd.sd_inptrs) amplifies the corruption by writing additional entries past the array boundary. This is a classic stack buffer overflow that may allow arbitrary code execution when gfs2_edit processes the crafted image. The Linux kernel GFS2 driver validates di_height against sd_max_height in gfs2_dinode_in(), but the userspace gfs2-utils performs no equivalent validation.