Bug 2545088 (CVE-2026-85088)

Summary: CVE-2026-85088 thrift: thrift: Man-in-the-middle attacks via improper certificate validation
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: unspecifiedCC: amctagga, aoconnor, bbrownin, bniver, flucifre, gmeno, groman, mbenjamin, mhackett, sostapov, vereddy
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
A flaw was found in Apache Thrift. During Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificate validation, the client libraries improperly evaluate the certificate's Common Name (CN) when subject alternative name (SAN) entries do not match the target host. A network-positioned attacker possessing a trusted certificate matching the host's Common Name can exploit this vulnerability to impersonate the legitimate server. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to intercept or tamper with encrypted communications.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-10-02 12:00:33 UTC
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift.



Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host

name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a "skip" result rather than

a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check.



RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a

Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name.



Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client's trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host

name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure.



This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. Users should upgrade to 0.25.0.