Bug 2552171
| Summary: | GVFS hardcodes gnome-keyring, with oo7 it fails to retrieve ssh key passphrases | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kamil Paral (Fedora Quality) <kparal.oss> |
| Component: | gvfs | Assignee: | GNOME SIG Unassigned <gnome-sig> |
| Status: | VERIFIED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 45 | CC: | decathorpe, gnome-sig, larouxn, ngompa13, oholy, rhbz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | RejectedBlocker | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Kamil Paral (Fedora Quality)
2026-10-14 12:36:19 UTC
This turned out to be a GVFS bug instead, filed here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/work_items/886 The upstream issue was fixed, can we please get a patch in Fedora? FEDORA-2026-2efc3d4d6e (gvfs-1.62.0-4.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-2efc3d4d6e FEDORA-2026-2efc3d4d6e has been pushed to the Fedora 45 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-2efc3d4d6e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-2efc3d4d6e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Works fine in my testing, fixes the sftp location issue -5 / +1 in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/quality/blocker-review/issues/2227 , marking rejected blocker. |