Bug 25610
Summary: | inetd-0.16-7 generates syslog messages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Need Real Name <dean-redhat> |
Component: | inetd | Assignee: | Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | brian, dr, pekkas |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-02-03 22:13:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Need Real Name
2001-02-02 02:31:13 UTC
For what it's worth, I have been getting these for a long time, long before updating inetd... Can you find what pids it spawned in /var/log/secure? (I don't have any 6.2 boxes around here right now...) All of these (I checked about 6-7 of them, about one or two a day) were ipop3d. Using: imap-2000-2.6 Notes: the client giving exit status 1 uses the service about 50-100 times for every exit. He's using a microsoft mailer, probably messenger. There are some people using RHL52 fetchmail to access ipop3d, who haven't shown the symptoms, but the use is relatively less, so... What I meant to ask was: Can you from information in one of the log files find out what server maps to which pid? Perhaps I don't still understand the question, but all 'exit 1' messages I had, have come from ipop3d (based on /var/log/secure and messages pids). OK, as I understand it you can then match the exit status from "messages" with the pids from "secure". Then it's useful debugging info - closing. it sounds like this message is new as of some changes after rh6.2 -- 'cause i wasn't seeing the log message before whatever version of inetd was "most recent" on 6.2 prior to this bugfix. regarding ipop3d -- if that wasn't tcp wrapped you wouldn't have a /var/log/secure entry ... if the inetd log message contained a port number that'd be sufficient for making it handle wrapped and unwrapped services. It's not new - there are only two changes in that RPM, the "don't leak file handles patch" from pekkas and "spell RETVAL correctly" in the init script. I am still getting tons of the following: Feb 23 14:32:59 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 5962: exit signal 13 Feb 23 14:33:03 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7123: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:09 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7125: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:17 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7130: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:22 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7132: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:27 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7133: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:33 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7134: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:38 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7135: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:43 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7136: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:48 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7137: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:54 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7138: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:33:58 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7139: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:34:02 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7140: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:34:08 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7141: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:34:15 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 7142: exit status 1 Feb 23 14:35:27 gonzo inetd[21492]: pid 2184: exit signal 13 These are all from imapd. This started the day I upgraded to inetd-0.16-7 (I have been running imap-2000-2.6 for many months) How is this not a bug?? thanks, -Brian I should note that many of our Outlook IMAP users have reported weird hanging and slowdowns that seemed to have started after the upgrade to inetd-0.16-7 -Brian Does anyone check this? I've gotten that too, after and before upgrades, but I haven't heard any complaints about it. This appears to be debugging information (inetd.c): --- if (debug) { fprintf(stderr, "pid %d, exit status %x\n", pid, status); } --- I don't see logging non-zero exit codes as a bug in inetd - if you're not interested, don't look for them or tell syslog not to care. |