Bug 2562644 (CVE-2026-99131)

Summary:	CVE-2026-99131 kernel: kernel: xfs: Disk quota bypass via improper capability check
Product:	[Other] Security Response	Reporter:	OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component:	vulnerability	Assignee:	Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified	CC:	akhatavk, aos-team-art-private, asdas, dpaolell, jdelft, jupierce, lgarciaa, mbiarnes, ppalepu, ppostler, prdhamdh, rhel-process-autobot, sghai, sidsharm, suppawar, vlaad, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:	A flaw was found in the XFS file system in the Linux kernel. An improper capability check verified a task's real credentials instead of its effective credentials, causing the system to treat certain attribute modifications as privileged. A user, particularly when modifying file ownership over a Network File System (NFS) client, can exploit this flaw to bypass storage quota accounting and exceed enforced disk quota limits.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-10-28 10:42:17 UTC

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: fix capability check in xfs

An user reported a bug where he managed to evade group's quota
by changing a file's gid to a different group id the same user
belonged to, even though quotas were enforced on both gids and the
file's size was big enough to exceed the quota's hardlimit.

Commit eba0549bc7d1 replaced a capable() call by a
has_capability_noaudit() to prevent unnecessary selinux audit messages.
Turns out that both calls have slightly different semantics even though
their documentation seems similar. Where in a nutshell:

capable() - Tests the task's effective credentials
has_ns_capability_noaudit() - Tests the task's real credentials

This most of the time has no practical difference but in some cases like
changing attrs (specifically group id in this case) through a NFS client
this will allow the quota code to use XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES, effectively
bypassing quota accounting checks.

Using instead ns_capable_noaudit() should fix this issue and prevent
selinux audit messages.

This also fix the remaining calls to has_capability_noaudit()