Bug 256501

Summary: mysql 5.0.22 still has a lot of bugs ; need upgrade
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Silecs SARL <support>
Component: mysqlAssignee: Tom Lane <tgl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0CC: byte, hhorak, jturner
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=24261
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2008-0364 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 15:23:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Silecs SARL 2007-08-27 14:12:01 UTC
Description of problem:
MySQL crash when WHERE contains NOT IN ('<negative value>') for unsigned column 
type
(upstream bug #24261)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.0.22 till 5.0.35


How reproducible:
see http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=24261


Additional info:
please provide update package to 5.0.45

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2007-10-16 03:43:51 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 4 Jay Turner 2007-11-30 07:03:50 UTC
QE will need assistance with validation efforts on the package rebase.  What
testing has occurred on the 5.0.45 codebase?  Are there results somewhere we can
review in order to fill out our internal test plans?

Comment 5 Tom Lane 2007-11-30 14:58:44 UTC
Well, the rest of the world, including Fedora 7 and 8, has been using 5.0.45 for awhile.  Given that MySQL 
AB stopped treating 5.0.x as a development branch (finally) awhile ago, I think we can assume that new 
releases are more stable than old ones, not less.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 15:23:48 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0364.html