Bug 258001

Summary:	Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	John (J5) Palmieri <johnp>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, jkeck, michael, mtasaka, notting, opensource
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-11-26 12:43:34 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description John (J5) Palmieri 2007-08-27 20:28:42 UTC

pyevent is the python bindings for libevent

Spec: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent.spec
SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-20 07:54:21 UTC

First fix up BuildRequires so that we can install
your binrpm and review it.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=167130

Comment 2 John (J5) Palmieri 2007-09-20 15:11:21 UTC

Ahha, sorry about that

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=167517

spec: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent.spec
SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm

Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-21 05:46:26 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm
(I guess 0.3-2)

For 0.3-2:
* Still fails on x86_64 (i386 okay)
  setup.py seems to be expecting that libevent.so should be under
  /usr/lib (not %_libdir)

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-09-27 11:37:41 UTC

ping?

Comment 5 John (J5) Palmieri 2007-09-27 15:45:03 UTC

Sorry looking into it.  Not sure how python distutils should handle this since
upstream doesn't use autotools templates here.  I want to do a correct patch and
send it upstream, not some quick hack.

Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-10-15 15:17:17 UTC

Any good from upstream?

Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-10-25 13:26:31 UTC

ping again?

Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-11-01 18:38:04 UTC

ping again?

Comment 9 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-11-12 09:49:56 UTC

I once close this bug if no response is received from the reporter
(submitter) within ONE WEEK.

Comment 10 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-11-26 12:43:34 UTC

Once closing.

Comment 11 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-08-04 06:45:13 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 457123 ***