Bug 2629
Summary: | rpm-3.0 expands macros in %ifos too late | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | benedict |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | Resent-Message-ID: <"r86zU.0.Oy4.XTCCt"@lists.redhat.com> | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1999-05-24 19:56:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
benedict
1999-05-07 09:34:40 UTC
Macros are correctly expanded before processing %ifX statements. Your example has a typo (iris6.5 vs. irix6.5), I can't tell which is wrong without examining uname(2) strings on an SGI platform. Please reopen this bug if there is still a problem. OK. Sorry about the typo. See Bug # 2873 The original problem for me was that I did not get any warning when I defined %irix6.x in a macro file - so I thought it was not expanded when I used a conditional such as %ifos %{irix6.x} |