Bug 26902
Summary: | rpm-4.0-6x seems completely busted | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | henry |
Component: | rpm-build | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | katzj |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-02-10 08:10:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
henry
2001-02-10 01:18:15 UTC
Did you install the rpm-build package? This is necessary in order to be able to build packages with rpm 4.0.x What he said :-) Yes, all the build modes in rpm-4.0 are in a separate executable called /usr/bin/rpmbuild contained in the rpm-build package. I have not seen any rpm-build which is part of the rpm-4.0-6x family. Note, with the older rpm that came with Red Hat 6.0, everything was in rpm and rpm-devel. If this exists, could you please tell me where it is? I don't think that another rpm is going to help. Observe the behavior or rpm that came in rpm-4.0-6x: if you run rpm -bp xxx it complains with a generic usage message as if it didn't understand the -bp option. If you do this with a working rpm then it will complain that xxx doesn't exist. It looks to me like the command line argument processing is busted. Am I being fooled? Ah, that fixed it. rpm-build didn't exist on Red Hat 6.0, only rpm and rpm-devel. Note, with only rpm-4.0-6x and rpm-devel-4.0-6x, I got only a usage message as if it didn't understand the -bp argument. In general I like RPMs, including making my own, but the error messages when things go wrong are not so great. Any way, thanks again. |