Bug 275511

Summary:	Is __find_requires really required?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	xinetd	Assignee:	Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	xinetd-2.3.14-14.fc8	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-09-18 12:12:17 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2007-09-03 19:17:09 UTC

Description of problem:
Is __find_requires really required? As far as I can see, it strips just a 
python dependency, but isn't python in each Fedora system anyway?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xinetd-2.3.14-13

Expected results:
Remove __find_requires, python should be there in any case and nevertheless 
there is something shipped, that requires python...

Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2007-09-06 08:56:12 UTC

I'd rather remove the inetdconvert script and whole dependency (hidden or
visible) is gone. Who would update FC2 to F8 or newer?.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2007-09-06 09:03:49 UTC

I do not want to release new version just with this simple change, it will be in
next xinetd update.

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2007-09-06 15:01:47 UTC

Feel free to drop the inetdconvert script. It's okay for me if you wait for 
other changes as long as this change gets into F8 final.

Comment 4 Jan Safranek 2007-09-18 12:12:17 UTC

Freeze for F8 test 3 is near and no other bug is pending, so let's release it
now... Look for xinetd-2.3.14-14.fc8.