Bug 279351

Summary: mesa-libGLU-devel missing from dependencies
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Bill C. Riemers <briemers>
Component: wineAssignee: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-08 08:12:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bill C. Riemers 2007-09-05 20:19:28 UTC 
Description of problem:

mesa-libGLU is missing from the dependencies list of the wine package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

wine-0.9.43-2.fc7.src.rpm

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempt to build on a x86_64 host using "rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i386
wine-0.9.43-2.fc7.src.rpm
2. Install all the required i386 packages.
3. Attempt to build again.
  
Actual results:

The build fails with error "undefined reference to gluNewTess".

Expected results:

mesa-libGLU-devel should be listed as a dependency in step 1.  Then after this
is installed in step 2, the build in step 3 will succeed.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Bill C. Riemers 2007-09-05 20:26:19 UTC 
After looking at the spec file, I see mesa-libGLU-devel is listed as a
requirement, but for some reason rpmbuild does not pick this up.  Perhaps, only
one library may be specified per line?
Comment 2 Andreas Bierfert 2007-09-05 21:19:04 UTC 
Hm interesting.  I don't see why it would not build. It builds fine in mock and
it shouldn't if something like libGLU stuff is missing (and hence it is required
and multiple requires per line are fine). I have no clue however why it is not
picked up. I will give it a test tomorrow.
Comment 3 Andreas Bierfert 2007-10-08 08:12:02 UTC 
I tested again with .46 today. Mock builds work fine. I guess there are some
other nitpicks for the multilib stuff maybe. I remember that building for i386
on x86_64 systems was a bit of a pain even w/o rpm. Please take a look at this
page for further information:
http://wiki.winehq.org/WineOn64bit#head-f5f9f414804f6ebe1b72b0dca85feaee42121811