Bug 28330
Summary: | WRemote upgrade causes xinetd to restart dropping up2date connection | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Component: | xinetd | Assignee: | Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | alikins |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-02-20 22:21:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Derek Tattersall
2001-02-19 18:02:58 UTC
I don't see how that is possible, as up2date doesn't use xinetd at all. Adrian? (just to clarify, so glen doesn't put this on the must-fix list: The report is probably bogus). I cant think of any connection between xinetd and up2date. It doesnt start anything from xinetd, or depend on anything typically launched from xinetd. Coincince, I suspect. Derek, if you can reproduce it, you can re-open it. If so, more info must be added so we can find out what is the problem - I can't see any way it could possibly be xinetd. |