Bug 29150

Summary:	kernel-headers-2.2.17-14 missing in 2.2.17-14 release
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	dmetz <dmetz>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.2
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-03-27 11:14:41 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description dmetz 2001-02-23 22:56:19 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686)


Our development systems are running the latest redhat-6.2 updates. We are
developing software using kernel-2.2.17-14 with kernel-headers-2.2.16-3. I
would like a new kernel-headers package. I'll be happy if you will reassure
me that the 2.2.16-3 headers are fully compatable with the 2.2.17-14
kernel. I suspect there are others with this same concern.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. download the latest redhat-6.2 updates
2. look at the kernel pkgs
3. note the missing kernel-headers-2.2.17-14
	

Actual Results:  I delayed installing the 2.2.17-14 kernel.

Expected Results:  Arrival of kernel-headers-2.2.17-14. Or confirmation
that the kernel-headers-2.2.16-3 were compatable.

Comment 1 Hugh Bragg 2001-02-28 13:17:09 UTC

I had the same concern, but I went ahead anyway.
My mistake, now i can't compile the masquerading into my kernel.
It works OK on my machines without ip_masq, but not the firewall machine.
This seems to be tha same as bug
<a href="http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26809">26809</a>.

Comment 2 Gene Czarcinski 2001-03-27 11:14:36 UTC

It appears that the kernel update which was created for RHL 7 was simply stuck
on RHL 6.2.  This is a major problem for RHL 6.2 since this update is useless on
most 6.2 systems which need headers.

Comment 3 Arenas Belon, Carlo Marcelo 2001-03-29 04:57:37 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28881 ***