Bug 294061
Summary: | udev creates zaptel devices with the wrong file permissions | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Dave Miller <justdave> |
Component: | udev | Assignee: | Harald Hoyer <harald> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 20:35:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dave Miller
2007-09-17 22:56:11 UTC
This seems to have originated from bug 140496, as best I can tell. Comment 6 on that bug seems to imply that the bug was closed because it was no longer needed since the driver package supplied its own udev rules, however, someone obviously committed the change anyway. Thx, for getting my attention to this. I am glad to remove these rules from udev. We just pulled the RHEL 5.1 update, which included a new udev, and obviously this wasn't included in it yet. It subsequently busted our phone system until we manually edited the 50-udev.rules file again. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. We just pulled the RHEL 5.2 update, which included a new udev, and obviously this wasn't included in it yet. It subsequently busted our phone system until we manually edited the 50-udev.rules file again. (In reply to comment #9) > please test Confirmed. This one indeed does not contain rules for zaptel, thus allowing the driver install to provide its own without stuff breaking. :) Thanks! An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0076.html |