Bug 30486
Summary: | qt-2.2.4 -- missing BuildRequire | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | R P Herrold <herrold> |
Component: | qt | Assignee: | Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Aaron Brown <abrown> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-03-06 21:19:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
R P Herrold
2001-03-03 21:06:45 UTC
It's quite obvious that qt would require XFree86-devel... I'll add the BuildPrereq when updating qt the next time, but this minor glitch doesn't warrant a new build just to fix this. Concur -- but this issue will catch folks in the local LUGs, It is one line in the spec file -- How about doing the edit, and a RAWHIDE close ? We close bugs as rawhide only if a new package has been built at least in the internal tree. I can savely close it as rawhide now because I've just updated the package to 2.3.0 though. ;) Thank you for the clarification -- I was unaware of that distinction -- Russ Herrold |