Bug 3121

Summary: chat-to-dip is a mess
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: rri0189
Component: netcfgAssignee: David Lawrence <dkl>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-07-13 16:03:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description rri0189 1999-05-28 14:30:45 UTC
When working with slip, netcfg creates a chat script, but
then translates it into a dip script.  But the translation
is trivial, and completely unusable for non-trivial
applications.  For example, what I _need_ is a dip sequence:

sleep 2
send &
sleep 1
send &
sleep 1
send &

I could, in theory, create this effect in chat with
"\d\d&\d&\d&", but netcfg translates that to

send \d\d&\d&\d&

which is of no use at all.

Between this, and the fact that linuxconf doesn't do the
chat-to-dip translation in the first place, it took me days
to get a connection to my IPS (IBM Global Network), and I
had to do it by a completely bass-ackwards
reverse-engineering attempt.  linuxconf, netcfg and usernet
should all work together, and either usernet should do slip
 with chat or linuxconf and netcfg should allow the user to
create a dip script in the first place.  Or just replace all
this hoo-hah with instructions in the install manual on how
to use chat or dip directly.  Right now, I feel like the kid
in the poster with spaghetti dumped all over him.

(For what it's worth, I'm a professional programmer with 34
years of experience, including about 2 years on IRIX.  But
I'm new to Linux, and I've never done slip or ppp before
without ISP-provided dialer software.)

Comment 1 Jay Turner 1999-06-28 16:16:59 UTC
This issue has been assigned to a developer for further action.

Comment 2 Michael K. Johnson 1999-07-13 16:03:59 UTC
The translation works for most folks, and so the answer is
to modify the dip script by hand if the generated script
does not work.  We'll never make a graphical interface that
maps the full power of dip's scripting language into a
graphical format, so no matter what small improvements we
make, each improvement will only help a few users and leave
us with a still-imperfect solution for a technology that is
now almost unused, in comparison with PPP.

The other possibility is to try to hook up chat and slattach,
but at least the last time I looked, one or the other or both
would require changes to do that, and probably even more
people would complain if we did that...