Bug 32048
Summary: | up2date crashes because of RPM conflict | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Magnus Johansson <l_magnus_j> |
Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Preston Brown <pbrown> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-03-20 02:46:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Magnus Johansson
2001-03-17 03:06:24 UTC
was there any other error message other than the report that there was a conflict in the package set? If it existed after this, then that is the currently expected behaviour. If there was a traceback or other error messages, then this is unexpected. Better handling of conflicts is going to be worked on for the next version. This particular conflict seems to be an error in the package set that is available on the beta server that probable needs to get resolved. No other error message was reported than the conflict. When I pressed Ok in the message dialog box, the up2date-application was terminated. A more reasonable behavior would have been to continue with other packages selected and just skip the one that had a conflict. It also took a while to pin-point which selected package to upgrade that had the conflict. This was never reported, only the one already installed package was reported. |