Bug 321231
| Summary: | Subject title of the mail generated by yum-updatesd are not very informative | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Frank Büttner <bugzilla> |
| Component: | yum-updatesd | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Karel Srot <ksrot> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | ksrot, pknirsch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-06-29 18:34:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Frank Büttner
2007-10-06 10:02:24 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. Again didn't want to do that. After reviewing the stats with James on 5-February-2008, given the fix isn't upstream yet but is expected to be resolved in Fedora9 GA, I've stripped the rhel-5.2.0 flags and set the rhel-5.3.0 and pm_ack flags to '?'. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release. Hi James, with yum-updatesd from RHEL5.8 the subject already contain the hostname. Seems there is nothing to do for RHEL5.9. Could you please confirm? # rpm -q yum-updatesd yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5 # cat /var/spool/mail/bz321231user ---------8<-------------8<------------8<--------- Subject: yum: 1 Updates Available (on XXX.YYY.redhat.com) From: bz321231updatesd.redhat.com To: bz321231user.redhat.com Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:59:21 GMT Hi, This is the automatic update system on XXX.YYY.redhat.com. There are 1 package updates available. Please run the system updater. Packages available for update: bz321231pkg Thank You, Your Computer ---------8<-------------8<------------8<--------- Yeh, the yum-updatesd I see in git for 5.9 has this subject for all emails it sends:
msg['Subject'] = "yum: %s (on %s) " % (subject, socket.gethostname())
...and AFAICS this hasn't changed since RHEL-5.0. So I'm a bit confused.
|