Bug 322511
Summary: | Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stewart Adam <s.adam> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | belegdol, bnocera, fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-08 19:24:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stewart Adam
2007-10-07 22:10:30 UTC
totem-xine package is already in Livna [1] and being merged into RpmFusion [2]. Please have a look: [1] http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/development/SRPMS/totem-xine-2.18.0-1.lvn7.src.rpm [2] http://lists.fedoraunity.org/pipermail/repo-merge-discussion/2007-October/000645.html I help maintain totem-xine at Livna, we thought Fedora would be a better place for it now that xine-lib had been moved into Fedora. Upstream has plans to make the engine selectable at runtime rather than compile time (gnome bz#459539), however for now I'm going to work on a parallel installable version since it shouldn't conflict totem. I'd be happy to have totem-xine and totem-gstreamer both built from the same source RPM, rather than having 2 different packages, which wouldn't share fixes, updates, etc. I'm not sure just how we'd handle that practically though. Maybe time would be better spent making the backend a runtime option as per upstream. Like Bastien said it would probably better to modify the current spec rather then two specs for the same package. I'll close this bug and report one against totem instead. |