Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||[PATCH] tweak Fedora dialog|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Component:||codeina||Assignee:||Bastien Nocera <bnocera>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||bnocera, rvokal, thomas|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-10-16 15:53:02 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Bill Nottingham 2007-10-09 13:27:28 EDT
The attached patch changes the Fedora-specific codeina dialog, based on recommendations from the Board: - removes explicit references to Fluendo/webshop. It still goes there, but this has less explicit branding. Allows it to easily work nicer in F9 when there are more options as well. - changes the wording some about free/patented formats - adds a link where users can go to get more information The patch does not touch the non-Fedora code at all. With this patch, the package needs to add: Requires: python-sexy as it's needed for the URL label.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-09 13:27:28 EDT
Created attachment 221521 [details] tweak dialog some
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-09 13:28:00 EDT
Created attachment 221531 [details] screenshot of the changed dialog
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-09 13:58:26 EDT
Created attachment 221571 [details] upated patch, fixes typo
Comment 4 Bastien Nocera 2007-10-09 14:11:53 EDT
I'd rather have content behind http://fedoraproject.org/codecbuddy/ before making a decision on that. I don't have any strong opinions on the wording, or removal of Fluendo branding from the Fedora dialogue.
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2007-10-15 15:58:06 EDT
So, the final freeze is upon us. We should either get content up on the wiki, or commit the patch without the link.
Comment 6 Karsten Wade 2007-10-15 17:28:02 EDT
The nice thing about the wiki/website is that we can change the content easily. Let's definitely *not* commit the patch without the link. I'll float this to f-docs-l and we'll have a draft up in a few days; something that is better than nothing. If any of you have any thoughts about what should or shouldn't be said on that page, I recommend you put a watch on CodecBuddy on the wiki.
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-16 15:17:31 EDT
Some content added to the wiki page. The fact that we can't embed the video might mean we redirect this somewhere static - the patch to codeina does *not* need to be changed for this (it's already pointing to a redirectable URL.)