Bug 32579
Summary: | New RPM updates do not include rpm-python | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Chris Siebenmann <cks-rhbugzilla> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-03-21 22:44:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Chris Siebenmann
2001-03-21 22:44:48 UTC
Yup. The root cause was a typo in a GUI window, so any gain from bumping the rpmlib soname wouldn't have helped. In fact, the rpm-python package already has an explicit dependency on the rpm package exactly the same as what would have happened if a new rpmlib soname had been auto-magically detected by find-requires. This isn't an argument for not changing the rpmlib soname (that certainly needs doing as well), only an observation. Yes there will be an errata for gnorpm, rpmfind, et al to handle the lack of change in the rpmlib soname, that's a different issue. rpm-python-4.0.2-6x is now available as part of the re-released errata. |