Bug 327471
Summary: | XFS on ia64 architecture should be available without bootswitches | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Oliver Falk <oliver> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ia64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-11 11:49:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Oliver Falk
2007-10-11 10:12:35 UTC
The RHEL5 kernel doesn't even include the xfs kernel module. Also, even if it were, it's not supported and exposing things of that nature in the installer which aren't supported isn't desirable. Jeremy, you knew, that this question will come: Why isn't it supported? Is XFS something that isn't in upstream kernel or what? As has been stated on many, many occasions, the decision to support something in Red Hat Enterprise Linux is based on a variety of factors including being able to fix problems encountered by customers. Filesystems are pretty expensive in this respect and so we limit what we support. If you want to campaign for more being supported, bugzilla is not the place for it. Instead, you should work it through support and/or your sales representative. Jeremy, I totally agree. It's not the best place to discus that, but I wanted to know if there are any *technical* reasons. Well so far, I don't see any; It's politics... There are SGI engineer sitting at RH who could take care about XFS and fixing problems. However, I'll try to *campaign* as you call it, in other places as well :-) |