Bug 32752

Summary:	vim: Symbol `ospeed' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Martin C. Messer <mmesser>
Component:	vim	Assignee:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.0	CC:	dbaron, derrickh, dr, michael.sterrett, redhat-bugzilla, sh
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-03-28 13:05:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Martin C. Messer 2001-03-22 23:43:55 UTC

vim: Symbol `ospeed' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking

I get the above error when I close vim after editing a file. I have just
applied the latest vim errata: 

[root@evelle /root]# rpm -qa | grep vim 
vim-minimal-5.7-8
vim-common-5.7-8
vim-enhanced-5.7-8
vim-X11-5.7-8

Comment 1 Zvi Har'El 2001-03-28 11:04:31 UTC

rebuilding the vim package solves the problem:
 cd /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS
 rpm --rebuild vim-5.7-8.src.rpm
 cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386
 rpm --force -Uvh vim*

Comment 2 Martin C. Messer 2001-03-28 13:05:49 UTC

Confirmed.

Comment 3 David Lawrence 2001-03-28 16:44:48 UTC

Verified this problem to occur with vim-minimal-5.7-8. This problem though does
seem to be fixed in our latest version of vim available either from rawhide or
in our latest beta called 'wolverine'. Her are the newest package names.

vim-common-6.0-0.26.i386.rpm    vim-minimal-6.0-0.26.i386.rpm
vim-enhanced-6.0-0.26.i386.rpm  vim-X11-6.0-0.26.i386.rpm

You can probably get these from ftp://rawhide.redhat.com

Comment 4 Andreas M. Kirchwitz 2001-03-28 21:11:04 UTC

Hmm,

I have the same problem with the new "vim" package (5.7-8) on all
RedHat 7.0 boxes. But installing a rawhide package with an experimental
version or rebuilding a package manually is not what I'd call a "resolved"
bug. ;-)

Will there be an updated version of the "vim" package with a fixed binary?

Regards,
Andreas