Bug 331531
| Summary: | Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Eric Harrison <eharrison> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dyoung, fedora-package-review, notting, pertusus, wtogami |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-11-20 04:01:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Eric Harrison
2007-10-14 22:21:01 UTC
The version/release of the package isn't right, have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837 Regarding the name, why not simply ltspswapd? For the source url, it is almost right, but please have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for an even better style. I don't think that %{_localstatedir}/opt/ is the right var directory for the swap files. Maybe %{_localstatedir}/lib/ or %{_localstatedir}/spool (with appropriate subdirectories), but /opt in general should always be left empty by rpm installations. You should use the -p switch to install, to keep timestamps, like install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd The Source3 file is a bit strange. Isn't it a remnant of something else? Suggestion: the %{_*dir} marcos already have a leading /, so it is not needed in ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/, or in /%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd Also ltspswapd.init lacks a lsb init header. Updated based on your comments Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SPRM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.1.20071016cvs.src.rpm You should change the LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH in ltspswapd.sysinit,
something along
sed -e 's;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=.*;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=%{swapdir};' %{SOURCE1} >
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd
(and if you are pedantic about timestamps, like I do)
touch -r %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd
No need for /sbin/service in Requires(post)
In the cvs checkout command there should be a switch that makes
sure that the cvs version is the same one than the one in the rpm.
%{_localstatedir}/lib/ltsp/ is unowned.
Does ltspswapd really requires nbd? It looks like it has its own
nbd-server implementation.
Now that there is a central configuration for ltsp5, I think that that package should use it too. It means that the config file won't be there is ltsp-server isn't installed, but this should never happen. Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SPRM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.3.20071016cvs.fc8.src.rpm - source /etc/ltsp5.conf to find swap directory - require /etc/ltsp5.conf - move /var/opt/ltsp5 to /var/lib/ltsp5 I think that it is wrong to require /etc/ltsp.conf. A user
may want to use ltspswapd alone. Therefore, I think that
%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd should still used, but only
if there is no /etc/ltsp5.conf. And it should be said in a
comment in %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd.
The corresponding code in init file would be
# Source ltspswapd configuration.
[ -f /etc/sysconfig/ltspswapd ] && . /etc/sysconfig/ltspswapd
[ -f /etc/ltsp5.conf ] && . /etc/ltsp5.conf
A dot is missing at the end of the %description
a -r or similar for the cvs command is also still missing.
Only a suggestion, but in general the %define are put at
the very beginning of the spec file.
Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.4.20071019cvs.fc8.src.rpm - source /etc/sysconfig/ltspswapd, then /etc/ltsp5.conf in initscript - read-only checkout from CVS - fix description, move %%define to top (In reply to comment #8) > - read-only checkout from CVS It is not what I asked for, I asked for the -r option of checkout: -r rev Check out revision or tag. (implies -P) (is sticky) You can also use -D. -added "-D <date>" as per comment #9 -updated config file location to match changes in ltsp-server Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.5.20071023cvs.fc8.src.rpm You should remove the dependency on /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf such
that the package may be installed on its own. And in my
opinion the comment in sysconfig/ltspswapd should be along
#
# the LTSP_SWAP_DIR variable is preferably set in /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf
# to have a central config file. If you don't want to use /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf
# you can also set this variable in this file
#
%{_localstatedir}/lib is already owned by the filesystem package.
You could also add LTSP_SWAP_DIR in a comment in sysconfig/ltspswapd,
like
# LTSP_SWAP_DIR=/var/lib/ltsp5/swapfiles/
The following lines are not useful if the comment is not there:
sed -e 's;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=.*;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=%{swapdir};' %{SOURCE1} >
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd
touch -r %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd
And if the comment is there, LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH should be
changed to LTSP_SWAP_DIR
nbdswapd is provided in the upstream ltsp repository, which builds into sub-packages ltsp-client and ltsp-server. We should verify that the upstream nbdswapd suits our needs, then cancel this review. OK, it is pretty clear that we will use upstream's script integrated into ltsp-server instead. Closing this as duplicate against ltsp-server. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 331731 *** |