Bug 333471

Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Parag AN(पराग) <panemade>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, gauret, notting, richard, tim.lauridsen
Target Milestone: ---Flags: panemade: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-06 16:00:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 333451    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Robin Norwood 2007-10-16 04:15:52 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: 
packagekit-gnome provides session applications for the PackageKit API.
There are several utilities designed for installing, updating and
removing packages on your system.


This requires PackageKit: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451

Comment 1 Peter Gordon 2007-10-16 04:26:43 UTC
Setting PackageKit bug dependency.

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-16 10:28:36 UTC
Preliminary review =>
1)I will suggest to have this package named as gnome-PackageKit.
2) Use of make should be as given in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e
3) defattr should be defattr(-,root,root,-)
4) Remove following line from SPEC from %files section
%{_datadir}/gnome-packagekit/pk-*.glade
5)You should install all .desktop files as given in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755

Comment 3 Robin Norwood 2007-10-16 20:13:50 UTC
Thanks again for the nice review:

1) Nope.  The upstream tarball is named gnome-packagekit, and in the absence of
any guidelines or consistancy for naming gnome addons, I'd rather just match the
upstream tarball.
2) Oops...fixed.
3) Fixed
4) Fixed
5) Fixed

Also, fixed the License tag: GPLv2+

http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit.spec
http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit-0.1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm

Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-17 03:41:53 UTC
Package looks ok. waiting for PackageKit updates now.


Comment 5 Robin Norwood 2007-10-23 16:14:27 UTC
Here are new packages to go with the new upstream version:

http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit.spec
http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit-0.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm

Comment 6 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-10-26 04:32:55 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
dfd4118a5980bac647660491fcc3698a  gnome-packagekit-0.1.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are honoured correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc files are present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ scrollkeeper, Gconf, update-dekstop-database, update-gtk-icon-cache scriptlets
are used.
+ package  gnome-packagekit-0.1.1-1.fc8 ->
  Provides: config(gnome-packagekit) = 0.1.1-1.fc8
  Requires: config(gnome-packagekit) = 0.1.1-1.fc8 dbus-glib >= 0.61 dbus-x11 >=
0.61 gnome-icon-theme gtk2 >= 2.10.0 libORBit-2.so.0 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2
libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgconf-2.so.4
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libnotify >= 0.4.3 libnotify.so.1 libpackagekit.so.2 libpango-1.0.so.0
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH)

+ GUI app.

APPROVED.


Comment 7 Robin Norwood 2007-10-30 18:10:54 UTC
Huh.  I guess I missed that this was approved several days ago.  Let's do a CVS
request, shall we?

Oh, and thanks again for the review(s), Parag!

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: gnome-packagekit
Short Description: GNOME applications for PackageKit
Owners: rnorwood
Branches: devel
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits:


Comment 8 Kevin Fenzi 2007-10-30 23:12:26 UTC
cvs done.