Bug 33595

Summary:	After upgrading to rpm-4.0.2-6x, snmd and snmpwalk give error in loading shared libraries
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Alessandro Villani <avillani>
Component:	ucd-snmp	Assignee:	Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	6.2
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-03-28 17:15:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alessandro Villani 2001-03-28 14:10:28 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686)


After I upgraded the rpm packages from v:3 to v:4, snmpd and snmpwalk
stopped to work.
When I give the command snmpwalk I get the message:
snmpwalk: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0:
undefined symbol: fdio
The same messages show up when snmpd start:
snmpd: : error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined
symbol: fdio



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. snmpwalk
2. 
3.
	

Actual Results:  The program dosn't start:
snmpwalk: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0:
undefined symbol: fdio

The current version of rpm is 4.0.2-6x, and the ersion of ucd-snmp is
4.1.1-2

Comment 1 Roberto Mansoni 2001-03-28 17:14:57 UTC

I did an "rpm --rebuild ucd-snmp-4.1.1-2.src.rpm" and the snmpwalk problem
went away, but I got the following message:

+ install -m 0644 libsnmp.a /var/tmp/ucd-snmp-root/usr/lib
install: cannot create regular file `/var/tmp/ucd-snmp-root/usr/lib': No such
file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.94515 (%install)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.94515 (%install)

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2001-03-28 17:20:57 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33085 ***