Bug 340011

Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jean-François Martin <lokthare>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-12-26 13:53:06 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Jean-François Martin 2007-10-19 12:57:21 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer-0.4.1-1.fc7.src.rpm

Description: With pyRenamer you can change the name of several files at the same time easily.
Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-10-28 09:54:31 EDT
(In reply to comment #0)
> Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer.spec
> SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer-0.4.1-1.fc7.src.rpm

Seems 404...
Comment 2 Jean-François Martin 2007-10-31 11:14:03 EDT
That works. It is my webhoster... sometimes files are not available 
Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-11-01 13:13:01 EDT
Well, for 0.4.1-1:

* Multiple documents directories
  - %files list says:
    Here two documents directories /usr/share/doc/pyrenamer/
    and /usr/share/doc/pyrenamer-0.4.1/ are created.

    Unless there is a reason both directories are _really_
    needed, move the files under %_docdir/%name into

Other things are okay. Then:
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
(NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review")

Review guidelines are described mainly on:
Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-11-07 02:53:05 EST
If you fix the issue in my comment 3, I will approve this package
(and will sponsor you as said in bug 330831)
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-11-09 06:43:52 EST
Removing needsponsor. So would you fix the issue in my comment 3?
Comment 6 Jean-François Martin 2007-11-11 14:26:55 EST
Yes, i ll do it for the fedora's repo. Just that i m busy for the moment and i
don't have time to spend at this.
Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-15 10:04:11 EST
Still you don't have any time? If so, I want to close this
bug as NOTABUG once.
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-19 08:52:24 EST
I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is gained from the reporter
by 2007-12-26.
Comment 9 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-26 13:53:06 EST
Once closing.

If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a
new review request and mark this bug a duplicate of the new bug.


Comment 10 Jean-François Martin 2008-05-27 10:03:09 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 448531 ***