Bug 340501
Summary: | FutureFeature -- Restructuring repositories into more suitable formats | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Frederik Hertzum <frederik.hertzum> |
Component: | yum | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | ffesti, james.antill, pmatilai, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-12-07 03:35:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Frederik Hertzum
2007-10-19 20:25:03 UTC
1. this would be a createrepo bug if anything 2. even if it were filed against createrepo I still wouldn't want this to happen to repositories. Closing wontfix. 1. Noted. 2. Why not? Splitting up into bin, lib and data requires breaking up the packages to much smaller pieces. This has several drawbacks and will require huge changes to rpmbuild, the build system and several other parts. What I could imagine to be worth looking at is having pure repositories per arch and using the i386 and x86_64 repository for x86_64. May be it is even worth thinking about an noarch repository. But all this is not likely to happen in the near future. Especially as it requires much more meta data to for the multilib arches to keep track of. Thanks for the explanation -- in the light of those arguments, I agree. I still like the idea of pure repositories though. |