Bug 342861

Summary:	multiarch conflicts in physfs
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component:	physfs	Assignee:	Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	1.0.1-7.fc7	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-11-01 21:22:41 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bill Nottingham 2007-10-19 21:53:38 UTC

physfs (or one of its subpacakges) has multiarch conflicts when installed for both i386 and x86_64 in the Fedora development tree. For help in resolving them, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks. 

  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/annotated.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/files.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/functions.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/functions_vars.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/index.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/physfs_8h-source.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/physfs_8h.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/structPHYSFS__ArchiveInfo.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/structPHYSFS__Version.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/html/structPHYSFS__file.html from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/doxygen.sty from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/index.tex from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/physfs_8h.tex from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/refman.tex from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/structPHYSFS__ArchiveInfo.tex from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/structPHYSFS__Version.tex from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8
  file /usr/share/doc/physfs-devel-1.0.1/latex/structPHYSFS__file.tex from install of physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package physfs-devel-1.0.1-6.fc8

(Note that this is an automated bug filing.)
It would be nice to have these bugs fixed by the beta of Fedora 9.

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2007-11-01 21:22:40 UTC

physfs-1.0.1-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.