Bug 35093

Summary: IMAP warns of errors during build
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide Reporter: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-redhatbugzilla>
Component: imapAssignee: Mike A. Harris <mharris>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0CC: nalin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-04-08 11:44:04 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Reuben Farrelly 2001-04-07 04:35:54 UTC
Hi,

When rebuilding the imap-2000-8.src.rpm I get this appear on the screen 
during the compile:

cc -g -O6 -mpentium -fPIC -DDISABLE_POP_PROXY=1 -
DIGNORE_LOCK_EACCES_ERRORS=1 -I/usr/include/openssl `cat OSCFLAGS` -c 
osdep.c
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/asn1.h:62,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/objects.h:960,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/evp.h:129,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:67,
                 from auth_ssl.c:22,
                 from auths.c:2,
                 from env_unix.c:113,
                 from osdep.c:41:
/usr/include/time.h:166: warning: type mismatch with previous implicit 
declaration
auth_md5.c:129: warning: previous implicit declaration of `time'
/usr/include/time.h:166: warning: `time' was previously implicitly 
declared to return `int'

I'm not building with Kerberos support (as I do not need it).

Running with glibc-2.2.2-7 and openssl-0.9.6-2  (I'm guessing it may be a 
problem with those packages not imap but I'm not sure)

Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2001-04-08 02:54:54 UTC
Can't reproduce.  What environment are you building under?  Latest
Rawhide, or Wolverine, Guinness?

Comment 2 Mike A. Harris 2001-04-08 11:31:25 UTC
Nalin, since this involves stuff you maintain, can you comment on it?
Seems fine to me, but perhaps there's something I'm missing..

Comment 3 Reuben Farrelly 2001-04-08 11:44:00 UTC
Ok, I am running mostly the latest rawhide RPMs but due to the fact that I 
cannot download the entire release every time some packages are updated (19c/MB 
over a modem makes it a bit impractical...), it is a mostly up to date rawhide 
release.

I've mentioned my glibc and openssl version, are there any other RPMS which you 
would need to know about?


Comment 4 Mike A. Harris 2001-05-18 07:22:58 UTC
This problem is long since fixed.  The problem is that time.h used
to be automagically included in sys/time.h, and it is no longer, for
standards compliance or something...  If you haven't already, please
upgrade to our latest release.