Bug 354641
Summary: | gnome-power-manager sets "bogus" ondemand tunables when on AC | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Tim Burke <tburke> |
Component: | gnome-power-manager | Assignee: | David Zeuthen <davidz> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | arjan, mclasen, shillman |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2008-0478 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-21 17:23:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 309171 |
Description
Tim Burke
2007-10-26 18:33:14 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. I will look into what is going on here. Arjan, What priority would you give this? this would be high priority; the effect of the mistuning is actually really bad while the fix is rather trivial... * Wed Jan 02 2008 David Zeuthen <davidz> - 0.5.8.1-30%{?dist} - Turn off the user space cpufreq stuff; it does more harm than good - Resolves: #306401 This solution is per comment 13 bug 306401 - see that one for details. I am not really clear on how this got labeled VERIFIED; is this truly VERIFIED as fixed? If so, by whom? Sorry; missed comment #8. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0478.html |