Bug 354741
Summary: | Review Request: clonekeen - "Commander Keen: Invasion of the Vorticons" clone | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-06 20:14:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Hans de Goede
2007-10-26 19:48:04 UTC
Initially I figured that there had to be some kind of trademark issue here, but I looked around and I really can't find any indication that any part of "Commander Keen: Invasion of the Vorticons" is trademarked. Still, I'm no expert, so I'll review the packaging but you'll really need to get an ack from someone who knows about this kind of thing. Ok, I've asked Spot to take a look and add a comment here. How did you determine the version of the GPL in use? I only see "GPL", no copy of the license itself and no mention of GPL or version in any of the source files except for what's in the scale2x directory. I guess that makes the original code "GPL+" and the linked product "GPLv2+", but if you have something more definitive it would be nice to have it in the package. Review: * source files match upstream: 4f46a8c22eda16ede27d6510090d2ee9cc9bd0ae7f43261289cae4b68e145842 CKBeta83_Src.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary is OK (assuming no trademark issues) ? description is OK (assuming no trademark issues) * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: clonekeen = 0.8.3-1.fc8 = /bin/bash /bin/sh autodownloader hicolor-icon-theme libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libdynamite.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) * Game tested manually; seems to work fine. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * desktop file looks OK. APPROVED, subject to the trademark thing. (In reply to comment #3) > How did you determine the version of the GPL in use? I only see "GPL", no copy > of the license itself and no mention of GPL or version in any of the source > files except for what's in the scale2x directory. I guess that makes the > original code "GPL+" and the linked product "GPLv2+", but if you have something > more definitive it would be nice to have it in the package. > Yes the clonekeen code is GPL+, but since the binary also contains scale2x code its GPLv2+, and so are the included extraction utilities I wrote. But indeed other then the reference to the GPL in the docs (and prominently on the website), there is no GPL copyright header for the clonekeen code itself. I've gotten a green light on the trademark thing from Spot by private mail, and thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clonekeen Short Description: "Commander Keen: Invasion of the Vorticons" clone Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: <empty> Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. Imported, build and updates for F-8 and F-7 pushed, closing. |