Bug 356181
Summary: | freetype2.pc version error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Steve <kkbbf81jd6> |
Component: | freetype | Assignee: | Behdad Esfahbod <behdad> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7 | CC: | fonts-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-05 05:03:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Steve
2007-10-29 04:31:34 UTC
9.15.3 is what gets passed to libtool as -version-info It is certainly surprising to see it show up in the pc file, but I am not sure that the semantics of the Version field are well-defined enough to declare this a bug. In any case, this needs to be brought up on the upstream mailing list, we can't deviate from the pc file that is shipped upstream, that is only leading to pain and confusion. The pkg-config manual says: Version: This should be the most-specific-possible package version string. That looks well-defined to me. What's the reference for the upstream bug report? Yeah, freetype has three different versions: - package version - libtool version - so version go figure... |